- Posted By: Patrick Chapman
- Comments: 0
64 Clovelly Road - back again - 205285FUL
64 Clovelly Road - abutting Lammas Park
- Read more about 64 Clovelly Road - back again - 205285FUL
- Log in to post comments
If you are a resident or business in or around central or east Walpole, click on this button to connect with us.
This is one of our core areas of work. All too often we are faced with development proposals that are wholly out of proportion to, or not sympathetic with, the area they are in. This results in us having to object, which can a time consuming process focusing on planning issues. We understand how to do this - whether the proposal is for one property or a whole area.
As an example, the picture to the right shows some of the buildings currently proposed for the town centre, replacing the shops and other buildings on the 'Arcadia Site', 9-42 The Broadway. This site was the subject of a "Call In" and Planning Inspectorate's Hearing a few years ago (ref: the Glenkerrin plan that included a 42 storey block of flats). These new proposals have resulted in another "Call In" - owing to the wall of opposition - and this will result in another Hearing in May 2017. We understand this to be the first time that the same site has been "called in" twice.
Ealing is going through a period of Renewal and Regeneration - but this does not mean tearing the heart out of our town centre and replacing it with faceless boxlike buildings as many developers wish to impose on us. We are not wanting "to Set Ealing and Walpole in Aspic", as is often claimed by self-interested developers, but we need to avoid flushing the baby out with the bathwater.
Ealing and Walpole have some special buildings (surrounded by some terrible ones). It is important to preserve our heritage appropriately.
Thankfully, most are on a smaller scale relating to single properties. They are set out below usually with their Ealing Planning System reference numbers. The system can be accessed by clicking on this link.
Members are welcome to add their own particular comments to our postings on the applications that we have hightlighted below; this helps us to judge the strength of any local feeling within our membership. Comments will tend to fall into two categories "planning issues" (eg size, architectural harmony, density, amenity space, overshadowing etc) and "environmental issues" (eg on-street parking, construction impact, creation of additional rental units etc). The former tend to have more weight when the Planning Department consider the merit of an application; the latter tend to have no weight - except in a Controlled Parking Zone for example - but can be a major concern to existing residents. So please consider how to frame any comments to have the maximum impact. If in doubt feel free to contact us at planning@walpoleresidents.org.
Two years' ago, Will to Win, the sports facilities operator in Lammas Park and Lammas Enclosure, applied for permission to build two Padel tennis courts with floodlights. They withdrew this application when faced by a massive number of objections (116).
We all seem to rely on mobile connections these days, but it comes at a price - the networks need to install transmitters. The latest application is for am 18m mast at the corner of the allotments on Northfield Avenue/Occupation Road.
Is it acceptable to demolish two houses and replace them with two blocks of flats?
There are times when we receive notification of planning applications and we think: "how can they possibly justify this?" Well, this is just the latest example.